Hmmm....different...

[rasga]

For those saying 'why'.

 

We had to upgrade from a 3. to a 4. version - for performance reasons.

 

The 3. style is totally incompatible with v4 - due to how the software providers have built the forum.

 

It had to be redesigned from the ground up in design, it's an iterative process. Between the 0.0.3Beta and the 0.1 Production - the theme designed totally fell apart. Hence we are running an earlier iteration, whilst we iron out the known bugs re: oddtext sizing in some areas, and many other bits that are on a snagging list.

 

There are other known issues to be resolved. We've been working with this in our 3 development areas for quite a while, but as with anything, on the production it doesn't roll smoothly.

[DIEM]

Have to agree is very bright on hung over eyes..

[crazyman]

ok, at first i didnt like it, then i thought... hey just adjust... now i think its ok... but its way too bright... geoff... how do you do the colour change locally?

[louisemarson]

Gawd! Stop complaining!

 

Ok, it's a litle bright but you still have a FREE working forum where you have freedom of speech, aren't censored for posting about another kite and where you can swear if you so wish. Everyone complained when it was changed to the dark scheme all those years ago. Get over it and get kiting!!!

[beth1974uk]

GO LOUISE!!!!!

 

Rah rah rah!!!

 

(that was my little cheerleading cheer eh Zimmer )

[SandMonster]

Gawd! Stop complaining!

 

Ok, it's a litle bright but you still have a FREE working forum where you have freedom of speech, aren't censored for posting about another kite and where you can swear if you so wish. Everyone complained when it was changed to the dark scheme all those years ago. Get over it and get kiting!!!

 

What Miss says!

[zimmer]

GO LOUISE!!!!!

 

Rah rah rah!!!

 

(that was my little cheerleading cheer eh Zimmer )

 

Just sitting here conjuring up images of pom poms and short skirts etc etc :-)

[-flyzone-]

i dont realy mind it, the white background problem ive had it when reading letters and stuff... for years....

 

i'm just going to sit back and c what happens:cool:

[Sir]

umm it would work if you didnt have the space between the 7 and the "

 

okey dokey ... Thing is that I didn't type that in, the advanced posting thing did it for me

 

Me and [sizw=7] computers [/size] just don't get on lol

[cookie121]

Either Neil has tweaked it down a bit or I have adjusted, but I am finding it quite fresh, good work man!!

[skye]

weird...but then i said that last time it changed...

well done ras a change is good for all of us

[tsp13]

I like it, I think it looks crisp and fresh and I think it is a big improvment on the old look.

 

Just one tiny snag.....

 

http://i702.photobucket.com/albums/ww28/plester300/linecopy.jpg

 

there is a kink in that line, not too much of a problem. But I think I have a bit of O.C.D. going on. lol

 

 

 

Edit - oh and pictures dont scale down to fit like they use to. But overall it looks good.

[Maddog-Pete1599968700]

I think you might call it a stepped line mate. I think it was planned aswell. It gets thicker by your name to.

Other than the colour scheme being to bright. (the grey border would be better than white) can we have the thread list so that the titles stand out more. Its harder to read that classified ads in the paper.

[Ped]

Woa!!!! So much for come back Sunday eh!!!

 

Little bit bright for me, my eyes were starting to sting there but hopefully there will be a darker option available further down the line:D

 

Loving the fact the post counts back up.......

 

Ped:D

[anything]

whats with the red vertical line next to some of the threads?

[kevob]

Change for the sake of change, now ive got to work out were everything is again

did we need to be compatible with version 4 ? we seemed to be ok before so what happened?

[Ped]

whats with the red vertical line next to some of the threads?

 

Its to tell you you've posted in that thread.

 

Ped:D

 

Edit - forget that looks like I'm talking shit!!!!!!!!!

Edited February 6, 2010 by Ped

[braddels]

yeah that's been bugging me too. other than that i like it, the white was too bright for me but i turned my laptop screen brightness down, sorted.

 

I like it, I think it looks crisp and fresh and I think it is a big improvment on the old look.

 

Just one tiny snag.....

 

http://i702.photobucket.com/albums/ww28/plester300/linecopy.jpg

 

there is a kink in that line, not too much of a problem. But I think I have a bit of O.C.D. going on. lol

 

 

 

Edit - oh and pictures dont scale down to fit like they use to. But overall it looks good.

[tsp13]

whats with the red vertical line next to some of the threads?

 

The red lines show the 'hot' topics.

 

no joke.

[-Olly-]

wtf is wrong with you people....

 

stop complaining

[flyer]

way too bright

[spiky_dave]

Good work on the site, i prefer it

 

Do agree with the light on dark though - too much time coding at the moment and it does make a difference.... BUT....

 

If you have firefox, just download a plugin called 'invertColours' - you can set it to do just one site, ie this one. See, you don't have to moan, you can just find a solution

[eeyore]

What Miss says!

 

what he.. and she said

(even tho its not quoted her...)

 

 

oh neil will there be a mobile one?

[-flyzone-]

Good work on the site, i prefer it

 

Do agree with the light on dark though - too much time coding at the moment and it does make a difference.... BUT....

 

If you have firefox, just download a plugin called 'invertColours' - you can set it to do just one site, ie this one. See, you don't have to moan, you can just find a solution

and this is the front pages inverted:

http://i277.photobucket.com/albums/kk62/15extreme/snapshot1.jpg

 

hm not so handy..

[martin]

how do i jump to a section after reading the new posts? There used to be a pop up menu you could jump to any section.