Jump to content
  • Jerry1600949551
    Jerry1600949551

    HQ Crossfire 2.4M - 7.7M

    HQ Take a step up:

    The Beamer is one of the most successful beginner/intermediate kites out there, and wanting to make a kite that would be the next step for flyers, but with the same affordability and robustness, HQ's foil designer Alex Hesse came up with the kite that was to become the Crossfire. Alex designed his own aerofoil profile, calling it the AH001, with the aim being to have predictable lift for the kite to be used for landboards, snowboards and the more extreme end of buggying. The initial size range is going to be from 2.4m to 7.7m.

    crossfire04.jpg

    On opening up the 4m prototype for the first time some key features became apparent right from the start. The kite is of very strong construction, with Mylar reinforced forward sections to the ribs the air vents are held open even with the kite lying on it's back on the floor. This to me means improved resistance to collapsing, with the vents held open the kite inflates readily on launched and can recover from any lack of internal pressure easily.

    crossfire02.jpg

    All bridle attachment points are reinforced, which coupled with the fully sewn Kevlar/Dyneema bridle makes for a tough set up. Velcro closures on the tips at the trailing edge allow for any errant sand or much to be much more easily cleaned out, and the sensibly placed Velcro bridle keep makes control of the bridle during packing much easier if you are in the habit of swapping lines a lot. By placing this keep within the leading edge of the kite the trailing edge can be weighted down wind sand etc for launching without the problem of burying the stored bridle which happens when the keeps are on the trailing edge.

    crossfire03.jpg

    Visually the kite is a little different from the rest. For the first time I can recall the benefit of the visual appearance of the kite is directed towards the pilot, rather than onlookers. With the underside being the main colour, and the upper skin in white the pilot is presented with an illuminated kite rather than the often pasty appearance of kites with white undersides and coloured tops. The decorative stripe which adorns the lower skin is reproduced on the top using the main colour of the underside of each kite size. With the kite aloft the pilot is presented with three layers of décor, the underside, the internal cross bracing ribs, then the top surface. Which all points towards a fresh looking kite which has good contrast against the skies which is easy to keep visually oriented.

    The Crossfire comes complete with standard pre-stretched Dyneema flying lines. I have never had to adjust any of the lines supplied by HQ, so no problems there. The handles are an improved version of the Beamer types, with thicker softer grips which will appeal to a lot of people, and the addition of nylon ferrules to protect the leaders where they exit the handle. The backpack is an excellent piece of kit which carries the big comedy zip the Beamers have which does make me grin. Kite killers have been included and a stake too, so there is no reason to buy anything else to get yourself airborne out of the packaging.

    crossfire05.jpg

    So, to flying. This kite is very well behaved on the ground. Staking through the brake loops allows the kite to sit tight on the deck reliably without any tendency for the trailing edge to lift up. Launching is straightforward, the kite rises in a gentle power up and sits at the zenith with ease. It is here that the 'step up' from the Beamer becomes apparent. This kite has lift, and where the Beamer was designed to have reduced lift, the Crossfire has it in abundance. You're not going to get rest at the top with this one!

    The pronounced arc shape to the kite means that the pilot is presented with a lozenge shape with it's curved leading and trailing edges. Manoeuvring around the edge it becomes apparent that the Crossfire is very stable, keeping in good shape in all but the most unsavoury of winds that all kites would suffer in. Unlike some kites the Crossfire responds well to control input whilst at the edge, so keeping it there is easy. Sending it through the power zone is where the real benefit of this kite comes to the fore.

    crossfire01.jpg

    The power these kites generate is big, very big. In direct comparison to a Beamer 5m for instance the Crossfire 4m generates way more power, and is rather more relentless in the way it delivers it. The airspeed is impressive too, one of the reasons why the Crossfire generates so much pull is due to the airspeed coupled with the aerofoil section working together. One thing I always look for is good control under braking. There are a number of 'high end' kites I could mention which become very twitchy with some brakes dialled in, so some time was spent perfecting the brake bridle configuration to ensure that the kite could be 'parked' in the wind window in a way which retains the controllability, but allows the pilot to get that extra 'bite' which comes from a slight application of the brakes.

    One thing which the range achieves is a genuine progression as you go through the sizes. Predictably the little 2.4 is a little rocket which is amusing in it's speed alone. As you go up the range the kites retain the same characteristics with the inevitable trailing off of speed as you get bigger. My favourite though is the 6.3. I like the winds where this is the right kite to use, and the combination of speed and power is a real joy for me in a buggy. With the lift thing there have been a few occasions where I have been floated out of the buggy, but always with grace. This kite 'glides'. Ripe for buggy jumping this kite strikes me as being far more user friendly than some kites put to this purpose as the lift is realised in a progressive rather than a snappy manner. Free jumping is a grin with these, without the 'snappy' feel of others launching yourself is smooth and the landings soft.

    crossfire06.jpg

    It was always in mind that there was to be a variety of control options, the Crossfire will be available with three. Standard handles, a bar with reversing and re-launch facility, and a bar option which uses pulleys on the kite end to gain tighter turning and a sharing of power through the bar and a chicken loop arrangement. This last version requires some setting up, but has the advantage of allowing brake setting to be dialled in through a de-power strap.

    In conclusion, and probably the most surprising thing of all, the price. Starting at around £160 these kites represent excellent value for money.

    Is there anything that could be done to improve them, well, maybe I'd like a purple one...

    Author : Jerry

    User Feedback

    Recommended Comments



    Regarding stability of Crossfire vs. Beamer: I have Beamers 1.8 and 3.6 and a Crossfire 4.0, flown obviously in rather different winds. What I noticed is this: when pelting down the beach on half wind with a Beamer right at the front edge of what it can do, it -- just as the Crossfire -- sometimes just collapses completely. I am not complaining about this -- that's probably down to me not leaving any margin for the poor thing. But it was just about always possible to get the Beamer up and going again without stopping the buggy -- restarting it while driving that is. Different with the Crossfire: this one has the annoying habit to get dog-eared (for the lack of a better word), i.e. one of the tips folds over the brake lines. No way to sort this out without staking down the lines and manually tidying the kite up. This happened to me number of times.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Mixed feelings on that one, making a kite bow tie resistant is abit like planning for failure. Better to concentrate prevention of the problem. I'm one of those that needs to be reminded that turns in buggies have to be spot on. I'm usually going too fast at the turns when I'm in an open space and end up depowering the kite by heading down wind too fast and too much, at least the first time I am :-), recovery success is about 90% for me. The Beamers flatter profile does make recovery a little easier as you say though.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    My comment was intended not so much as a complaint than an observation. Flying the Crossfire for a while and *NOT* folding it up feels a bit more an accomplishment than doing so with the Beamers :-) As far as turns in the buggy go: I guess I tend to make them almost too tight for the fun of all the sliding action. Hee. Hee.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    MisterB, whilst I have only flown my CF4.0 static, the "dog eared" effect that you describe sometimes happened at the edge of the window. I found that by letting the brake lines out a knot (onto the third one) this did not happen! Now there's no science behind by madness and I couldn't hazard a guess at to why this works 'cos I'm not Jerry (lol), but it definitely made a difference.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    My crossfire 4.0 had me jumping for joy this weekend with the wind up around the 25 mph point. Too much power for me to jump into my buggy and feel safe as I'm new to the sport. Mega scuds for as far as you want, vertical lifts awsome. Then for no reason two of the bridal lines snapped "gutted". Talking to my local kite shop I have learned that this is a problem with early editions of the kite. I,m hoping that I can change the kite for a replacement. We wiil see.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Spot on Jerry. The failure was exactly as you said in two places. The kite is being replaced. Excellent service from Mission Adventure of Brixham. Highy recommended. Good work Alex.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    If you check out the Video 'Westward ho short' in the movies section, you'll be seeing a CF 3.2 pulling the camera buggy. Not many views of the kite, but not bad speed and stuff going on there considering other buggiers were in the 4-5M range. The one shot of Xender in the standard Flexi passing all of the kites on the ground shows him upwinding to get to some space at the top end of the beach, so less speed there. If you can't find the vid, let me know and I'll give you a direct link to a slightly better edited one.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    we have a beamer 3,6, 5,0 and a crossfire 7,7 . we also use a flex and flysurfers 10m and 13 m for summer as well as winter kiting. a ozonne 9 m has been added this year. the d powers are great for extended use of the same kite. the costs becomes a factor ... we find that for the money, so far, we like the beamers and the crossfire. D power will be a must as well as the bars. The white lines are a definite problem in snow, we used fluorescent felt markers cutting the ends with a knife creating a slot . green and red but also other colors for 30 m lines. in a bag it is usefull to know which is which. i would like some info on d powers for retrofit on crossfire 7,7 or beamers.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    the only problems I have found with the 4.0m is that i) it falls out the sky at the top of the window if the handles are yanked - on a blade this = lift, and the kite killers supplied are awful! failed on first deployment.... otherwize, a lovely bit of kit...you get what you pay for!!

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    hi i have just got into kiting ( 3months) and looking to buy my first 4 line power kite. i was thinking for a 3.6 beamer or a 3 rage but after reading this review i am very temped to go for the 3 crossfire, i currently fly fexi super 10 stacked with a pro 8, would the 3 crossfire be a good 4 line starting kite thanks

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    After much research, talking with other flyers, pricing, comparing characteristics and reading pretty much all the reviews here on racekites I finally placed my order for the Crossfire 3.2 as my introduction to traction kites. I went with the CF 3.2 becuase it seemed to be the most balanced for someone my size, 250lbs (about 18 stone) and experience (sport kite flying for the last 3 months). I'm a rookie to traction kites but not to working the wind window. I'll be flying static (for now) and here in Texas we get lots of varied winds. I looked long and hard at the beamer 3.6 but decided I'd get bored with it too quickly since it has virtually no lift and I know I want to hop around some. HQ seems to have some of the best packages going for entry level kites which was another decideing factor. I am, however, already looking into Flexi's products as my next investment, maybe sometime next year. I'll be posting a full review on my 3.2 in the near future. Thanks to Racekites for the great resourse, it's been very helpful for someone like me living in an area where kiting is just starting to catch on. My local kite shop (the only one for 200 miles) thanks you as well.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites




    Join the conversation

    You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

    Guest
    Add a comment...

    ×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

      Only 75 emoji are allowed.

    ×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

    ×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

    ×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

    Loading...

×
×
  • Create New...