Neebie Posted April 11, 2008 Report Posted April 11, 2008 Guillermo Habacuc Vargas desverse to die..... slowly, this sick monster tied up a dog in a gallery and left it to starve to death in the name of "art" LINK Quote
abba Posted April 11, 2008 Report Posted April 11, 2008 Art has to involve skill imo Anybody with two hands can find a dog and tie knots Quote
Duderino Posted April 11, 2008 Report Posted April 11, 2008 If i was in the same room as him the walls wud be red !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! Quote
Bertie Posted April 11, 2008 Report Posted April 11, 2008 i hate dogs, but i cant believe someone would do that Quote
Ped Posted April 11, 2008 Report Posted April 11, 2008 Guillermo Habacuc Vargas desverse to die..... slowly, this sick monster tied up a dog in a gallery and left it to starve to death in the name of "art" LINK Totally agree with you that truly is sickening!! Also that US marine needs shot for throwing the puppy off the cliff further down the page:mad: Quote
Sand-Yeti Posted April 11, 2008 Report Posted April 11, 2008 Guillermo Habacuc Vargas the Costa Rican isn't an artst. He's a sick perverted low life that makes me ashamed to be a human being. Cruelty to any animal by humans is always sickening. How come he was allowed his sick animal torture? The gallery owners are equally as bad. What about visitors to the gallery? Why didn't they do something? Cruelty to animals makes me angry and brings tears to my eyes. Quote
Nemo Posted April 11, 2008 Report Posted April 11, 2008 It's not art it's torture. If someone did the same in thier back garden in this country, we would have the RSPCA out and the person would end up in court. Quote
Dan Masochist Posted April 11, 2008 Report Posted April 11, 2008 Guillermo Habacuc Vargas the Costa Rican isn't an artst. He's a sick perverted low life that makes me ashamed to be a human being. Cruelty to any animal by humans is always sickening. How come he was allowed his sick animal torture? The gallery owners are equally as bad. What about visitors to the gallery? Why didn't they do something? Cruelty to animals makes me angry and brings tears to my eyes. If i was in the gallery i'd of definately done something about it i think i could actually kill the so called artist, cant believe people would walk by watching a poor dog starve to death. Quote
-Olly- Posted April 11, 2008 Report Posted April 11, 2008 that is awful. how the hell; can he get away with it. i say we shoudl let the artist die of hunger bu chainign him up Quote
Nemo Posted April 11, 2008 Report Posted April 11, 2008 I don't think doing the same to the "artist" is the right move. 'Cos if we do the same, aint we no better than him? Life-time of prison food would do Quote
kite geek Posted April 11, 2008 Report Posted April 11, 2008 That is so sad. I really really don't know how someone could do that to a animal. How does he see that as art? Quote
Dan Masochist Posted April 11, 2008 Report Posted April 11, 2008 I think castration would be a better punishment, all off! Quote
kinny Posted April 11, 2008 Report Posted April 11, 2008 chain him up and leave him in a room full of people, i bet he doesn't get chance to starve the absolute 5hithouse! Quote
The Geoff Posted April 11, 2008 Report Posted April 11, 2008 I don't think doing the same to the "artist" is the right move. 'Cos if we do the same, aint we no better than him? Life-time of prison food would do Actually, if we did the same it would be "art". And we'd have precedent. Quote
-Olly- Posted April 11, 2008 Report Posted April 11, 2008 right that was a bad idea wernt it/ tie him up for 3 days then relaese him might do the trick Quote
eifion Posted April 11, 2008 Report Posted April 11, 2008 If i was in the gallery i'd of definately done something about it i think i could actually kill the so called artist, cant believe people would walk by watching a poor dog starve to death. Which was kind of his point. He found the dog sick, starving and tied to a pole. Till he moved it to a gallery nobody cared, nobody was outraged. Thousands of strays die, ill and starving every day and nobody is outraged. Worse still, thousands of people die every day in our poorest countries, and the majority of us aren't outraged. That's the point the artist was trying to make. He's still a sick **** tho, and yes, if he were tied to a chair and someone offered me 5 minutes alone with him and a baseball bat, I'd find it hard to restrain myself. Quote
Tyler Durden Posted April 11, 2008 Report Posted April 11, 2008 Did this actually happen? Which country allows this kind of thing? Quote
Tyler Durden Posted April 11, 2008 Report Posted April 11, 2008 Wikipedia says this. The director of the Códice Gallery is reported as saying that the animal was only tied up for 3 hours on one day and was fed and that finally the dog escaped Quote
The Geoff Posted April 11, 2008 Report Posted April 11, 2008 Ahhh....that's all better. "Artist makes profit from starving animal" You see kids? Money was involved, profit was to be made, so it's all OK. If you really want to make a point you would dognap cruelly bred pedigree dogs (you know the kind, the ones that have trouble breathing or walking because of their owners oh-so-fine breeding), being very careful to cause them no harm or distress (dog + a bit of steak + tummy rubs = happy dog for a week), then donate the ransom money to the PDSA or something. Animal cruelty comes in many forms, the ones involving money being the most acceptable. Just a argumentative point, not a realistic suggestion or encouragement. My flatmate has just suggested that a real artist would be able to communicate this through symbolic means...painting, sculpture....things like that. Quote
flyer_gaz Posted April 11, 2008 Report Posted April 11, 2008 I dont often post on here but that is f**king sick, how could anyone do something like that to another living creature in the name of art .... Quote
Neebie Posted April 12, 2008 Author Report Posted April 12, 2008 I don't think doing the same to the "artist" is the right move. 'Cos if we do the same, aint we no better than him? i disagree the dog didnt deserve it, whereas that sicko would Quote
Nomix Posted April 13, 2008 Report Posted April 13, 2008 I don't think doing the same to the "artist" is the right move. 'Cos if we do the same, aint we no better than him? i disagree the dog didnt deserve it, whereas that sicko would Have to agree with Neebie ............ Quote
matty_cross Posted April 13, 2008 Report Posted April 13, 2008 that is awful. how the hell; can he get away with it. i say we shoudl let the artist die of hunger bu chainign him up That's what I was thinking. Damn I feel so angry now.... Quote
Steve1599968621 Posted April 13, 2008 Report Posted April 13, 2008 Animal cruelty comes in many forms, the ones involving money being the most acceptable. ..and if they taste nice, even better. Quote
Mikerb Posted April 13, 2008 Report Posted April 13, 2008 Having just read the article, and all of your comments, whether the dog died or, was released, it should NOT have happened, nor been allowed to happen. Animal cruelty is one of the lowest things a so called human can resort to, no animal asks to be mistreated, whether it's a tied up dog left to starve, a puppy kicked, whatever. Mans Best Friend, makes you wonder if they'd rather just be left alone Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.