sharpey1 Posted October 3, 2006 Report Posted October 3, 2006 hi what is 180 daN in kg or lb thanks Quote
LoKi_79 Posted October 3, 2006 Report Posted October 3, 2006 it is 180 kg. [daN = decanewton = 1.02 kg] Quote
FO Kite Posted October 3, 2006 Report Posted October 3, 2006 daN expresses the force that the line can take......all forces are measured in Newtons. If you convert it to mass in kilograms you need to work on the basis that a mass of 1Kg has a weight on Earth of 9.8 N So a decanewton is basically 1/10th of a newton so it gives an easy conversion 500daN...........500Kg load F/O Kite.......................was this part of your science homework? Quote
MadAndy71 Posted October 3, 2006 Report Posted October 3, 2006 By of a strange way to present your lines strength but hey ho:) Quote
LoKi_79 Posted October 3, 2006 Report Posted October 3, 2006 all forces are measured in Newtons. careful what you say - the SI unit of force is Newtons, but you can measure it how you like Quote
8015 Posted October 3, 2006 Report Posted October 3, 2006 By of a strange way to present your lines strength but hey ho:) Most of the European manufacturers label their lines in DaN. It isn't quite the correct SI unit but it is more accurate than kg, which is as already stated twice, a mass not a force. If you use your lines on the moon, they will still break at the same amount of DaN (or N or kN for more normal engineering orders of magnitude) but you could suspend a lot more kg of mass from them. Of course since we mainly fly at sea level it makes no difference in practical terms! The first 2 replies are quite correct, I wasn't going to respond because they are already there, but then MadAndy inspired further explanation! Jim Quote
MadAndy71 Posted October 3, 2006 Report Posted October 3, 2006 By of a strange way to present your lines strength but hey ho:) Most of the European manufacturers label their lines in DaN. It isn't quite the correct SI unit but it is more accurate than kg, which is as already stated twice, a mass not a force. If you use your lines on the moon, they will still break at the same amount of DaN (or N or kN for more normal engineering orders of magnitude) but you could suspend a lot more kg of mass from them. Of course since we mainly fly at sea level it makes no difference in practical terms! The first 2 replies are quite correct, I wasn't going to respond because they are already there, but then MadAndy inspired further explanation! Jim I know my physics but not everyone does. Some poeple..most I would say, would be more at home with seeing lb's or Kg's as a breaking strain. Quote
LoKi_79 Posted October 3, 2006 Report Posted October 3, 2006 By of a strange way to present your lines strength but hey ho:) it actualy makes more sense [to me] to use a force rather than a mass. but because gravity is (fairly) constant, we can use mass and force interchangeably. indeed kilogram-force is can be represented by kg: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kilogram-force Quote
FO Kite Posted October 4, 2006 Report Posted October 4, 2006 ""careful what you say - the SI unit of force is Newtons, but you can measure it how you like "" Not in my class Loki F/O Kite Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.