soliver1599969029 Posted June 7, 2014 Report Posted June 7, 2014 (edited) Mick, Yes, Reactor 2's and what I hear of the 2013's fly great inland. They have a higher AR (4.5) (edit: relatively higher) so they go upwind very well. They behave much better than other kites I've flown in the same genre. I have the 8.6m Reactor 2 and can buggy in 6-7mph wind and static fly in lighter stuff. It just drops off in the lulls and does require patience. My 5.5m Reactor 2 is a dream in anything Over 8mph. Their benefit is their stability. They are super stable indeed. Both of these vids are of me using the 8.6m and fighting through the lulls with 5-8mph stuff. Dreams on Vimeo OOBE field 11/30/2013 on Vimeo Edited June 7, 2014 by soliver Quote
SPIKY JACK Posted June 7, 2014 Report Posted June 7, 2014 My low wind buggy engine is my Mk 1 blade on 30 mtr Flexi lines gives you a nice window to play in Quote
soliver1599969029 Posted June 10, 2014 Report Posted June 10, 2014 I had a killer session on my 8.6m RII today... Started out really light... So light that I almost packed up and went home, but ended up around 9mph wind gusting in the low teens... It got to be a little bit of a handful at the point that I almost crashed it into a light post ... That's when I pulled out and ended the day with the 5.5m The Reactors are really great kites; like I said above, super stable, very low lift and really fast. Quote
waltweb Posted June 26, 2014 Report Posted June 26, 2014 Arrrrh C-Quads. A much miss-understood, and underused powerhouse of a kite system! I wish I had kept mine, but had to sell them to aquire new kites! Ho! Hum! Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.