Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
Well... the Venom goes upwind really well, just point and go:D

 

agreed. once its lit, it flies very close to the wind and gets upwind better than my LEIs of a similar aspect ratio

 

should mention this seems to apply to high winds only - maybe as the arc has a smoother profile than an LEI or SLE can since there is not bulk leading edge the kite can penetrate the window better

 

in more moderate winds, the ARCs performance is not as good as LEI or SLE so upwind basically sucks

 

but when its nuking, the arc flies so far to the edge of the window. not saying they are ALL the best upwind kites ALL the time, just that when its nuking, they go upwind like bastads

 

anyway off down pub now - battle of the bands!!

Posted
G's are fine upwind, as long as there is **** loads of wind! Venoms are much better, but I find a mid/high aspect LEI or foil is the best for pointing.

 

then you need to try a phantom :)

 

aspect ratio of 6.5m yet still one of the most stable kites for your money

 

of course this kite has as much going against as it does for it

Posted

Yes, but we're talking about on the water, and I know dave is new to the wet stuff;).

 

 

 

then you need to try a phantom :)

 

aspect ratio of 6.5m yet still one of the most stable kites for your money

 

of course this kite has as much going against as it does for it

Posted
Probally pretty similar they are both on the low end of mid aspect ratio. Niether is an upwind machine. Kinda pointless discussion as the biggest factor has gotta be the rider....

G13 isn't Low Aspect its High Aspect Ratio.

 

Peter Lynn give 4.5 but thats for its projected area.

 

Do the maths with Span, Area and Cord it's in Phantom Territory around '6.4'

Venoms are 5.0 quoted by PL and with the maths.

Posted
G13 isn't Low Aspect its High Aspect Ratio.

 

Peter Lynn give 4.5 but thats for its projected area.

 

Do the maths with Span, Area and Cord it's in Phantom Territory around '6.4'

Venoms are 5.0 quoted by PL and with the maths.

 

Ok, I did'nt know the 4.5 quote was for projected area hence my comment the its on the low end of mid aspect ratio, I never said it was low! It's probally higher aspect than Toro then and probally better upwind. The Toro was never a highly rated kite anyway.

Posted

ok i know you didnt ask but i am going to say how much better flysurefers are to lei for upwind pull i was out today with a guy on a lei he put his kite to the side of the window and walked to the water with almost no pull me on the other hand had my psycho 2 at the side of the window and i was getting dragged so much i had to dump the kite and pack it away i couldent belive the amount of pull it had

 

ps 7m in 21mphish winds

Posted

Nope flysurfers arent included :o - only jokin

 

The only thing was that Mark came back from his first kitesurfing session ever and just stated that hes gettin an LEI instead of his GI 13m as he said they are so much better upwind - but i think thats a load of crap as i believe as most peeps have mentioned its down to pilot experience/control more than anything - PL Gs are built for water after all.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...